Ask HN: Do we need a language designed specifically for AI code generation?
Ask HN: Do we need a language designed specifically for AI code generation?
3 by baijum | 2 comments on Hacker News.
Let's run a thought experiment. If we were to design a new programming language today with the primary goal of it being written by an AI (like Copilot) and reviewed by a human, what would its core features be? My initial thoughts are that we would trade many of the conveniences we currently value for absolute, unambiguous clarity. For example: - Would we get rid of most syntactic sugar? If there's only one, explicit way to write a `for` loop, the AI's output becomes more predictable and easier to review. - Would we enforce extreme explicitness? Imagine a language where you must write `fn foo(none)` if there are no parameters, just to remove the ambiguity of `()`. - How would we handle safety? Would features like mandatory visibility (`pub`/`priv`) and explicit ownership annotations for FFI calls become central to the language itself, providing guarantees the reviewer can see instantly? - Would such a language even be usable by humans for day-to-day work, or would it purely be a compilation target for AI prompts? What trade-offs would you be willing to make for a language that gave you higher confidence in the code an AI generates?
3 by baijum | 2 comments on Hacker News.
Let's run a thought experiment. If we were to design a new programming language today with the primary goal of it being written by an AI (like Copilot) and reviewed by a human, what would its core features be? My initial thoughts are that we would trade many of the conveniences we currently value for absolute, unambiguous clarity. For example: - Would we get rid of most syntactic sugar? If there's only one, explicit way to write a `for` loop, the AI's output becomes more predictable and easier to review. - Would we enforce extreme explicitness? Imagine a language where you must write `fn foo(none)` if there are no parameters, just to remove the ambiguity of `()`. - How would we handle safety? Would features like mandatory visibility (`pub`/`priv`) and explicit ownership annotations for FFI calls become central to the language itself, providing guarantees the reviewer can see instantly? - Would such a language even be usable by humans for day-to-day work, or would it purely be a compilation target for AI prompts? What trade-offs would you be willing to make for a language that gave you higher confidence in the code an AI generates?
About musicontheradar
No comments